Share via Email A public sector worker striking in east London last year. Marx and Engels wrote in the second best-selling book of all time, The Communist Manifesto:
Are you sure that you want to delete this answer? Yes Sorry, something has gone wrong. The main book on the Marxist view of the family is "The origin if the Family, Private Property and The State," by Frederick Engels, written inafter the anthropologist Lewis Henry Morgan published his book, "Ancient Society," which included new research on the origin of the family.
The Marxist view of the family is that it didn't always exist, that different forms of social kinship existed for different societies. Eleanor Leacock, a Marxist argues in her book, "The Myths of Male Domination," that the historic subjugation of women began with the formation of the traditional family, she argues, as does Engels and Morgan, that woman had an equal position to men in primitive communist societies, i.
Leacock presents as evidence for her argument the diaries of Jesuit priests who first came into contact with certain native American tribes that hadn't been cross contaminated by capitalist or feudal society. The Jesuit priests note how although women have different tasks to preform than men they don't have a subordinate position to men and in some cases woman would be chiefs if they had such a thing.
Engel's argues that in these societies the primary mode of organization and child rearing isn't the family, but the clan. In these societies all the children of the tribe were raised collectively and together. Leacock argues that surnames were often transferred matrilineally, i.
To sum up the Marxist view is that the family, as it stands had a beginning. The subjugation of women is tied up with the rise of class society and in particular the rise of agricultural society.
Social classes were impossible to form in primitive societies. Leacock presents examples of women that take on 2 husbands or vice versa if there was an imbalance of men and women in the tribe.
This is a radical view because it says that the traditional family didn't always exist and may not always exist. According to this thinking male and female jealousy arise socially and not because of instinct. Traditional marriage comes from feudalism, "to love honour and obey," your husband, these are the same vows a peasant had to make to their Lord.
This view argues that monogamy didn't always exist. This view argues that with a future social revolution that eliminates class divisions in society, the nuclear family will change or disappear.Oct 07, · Assess the Marxist view that the main role of the family is to serve the interests of capitalism?
(24 marks) I have a sociology essay in for monday and I have no idea how to structure it Status: Resolved. Marxist View on the Family Essay Marxists Views on the Family There are three Marxists views of the family, Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels and Eli Zaretsky; they all see all institutions such as education, the media and the family as maintaining class inequality and capitalism.
Marxism is a method of socioeconomic analysis that views class relations and social conflict using a materialist interpretation of historical development and takes a dialectical view of social transformation. May 10, · This therefore shows that the feminist view of the family is flawed, as it is a very one-sided, negative view.
Remember: Keep the conclusion simple and straightforward. Actually, come to a clear conclusion in your answer.
‹ Previous Marxist Perspective on the Family – Essay. The Guardian view Columnists Letters Opinion videos Cartoons Why Marxism is on the rise again The irony is scarcely wasted on leading Marxist thinkers.
The relation of women as a social group to the analysis of economic class has spurred political debates within both Marxist and feminist circles as to whether women’s movements challenging male domination can assume a common set of women’s interests across race, ethnicity, and class.
while other research takes a more critical view.