KimballExecutive Director, x Updated:
In order to make up for a lack of sales from domestic and traditional markets for military equipment, newer markets are being created or sought after. This is vital for the arms corporations and contractors in order to stay afloat.
Respect for human rights is often overlooked as arms are sold to known human rights violators. Heavy militarization of a region increases the risk of oppression on local people. Consequently reactions and uprisings from those oppressed may also be violent.
The Middle East is a current example, while Latin America is an example from previous decades, where in both cases, democracies or popular regimes have or had been overthrown with foreign assistance, and replaced with corrupt dictators or monarchs.
Oppression often violent and authoritarianism rule has resulted. Sometimes this also itself results in terrorist reactions that lash out at other innocent people. A deeper cycle of violence results. The arms trade may not always be a root cause, because there are often various geopolitical interests etc.
However, the sale of arms can be a significant contributor to problems because of the enormous impact of the weapons involved. Furthermore, some oppressive regimes are only too willing purchase more arms under the pretext of their own war against terrorism.
In quoting a major international body, six basic points harshly criticizing the practices and impacts of the arms industry are listed below, by J. That the armament firms have been active in fomenting war scares and in persuading their countries to adopt warlike policies and to increase their armaments.
That armament firms have attempted to bribe government officials, both at home and abroad. That armament firms have disseminated false reports concerning the military and naval programs of various countries, in order to stimulate armament expenditure.
That armament firms have sought to influence public opinion through the control of newspapers in their own and foreign countries. That armament firms have organized international armament rings through which the armament race has been accentuated by playing off one country against another.
|The reason for this attention is obvious: While there is no overarching theory of interstate arms transfers, scholars generally agree on the base motivations of states to engage in arms transfers.|
|The Arms Trade Treaty:|
|No nation, region, or sub-region is immune from the dangers posed by the illicit trade in and the proliferation of SALW.|
That armament firms have organized international armament trusts which have increased the price of armaments sold to governments.
Smith was quoting the League of Nations after World War I, when Stung by the horrors of World War I, world leaders realized that arms merchants had a hand in creating both the climate of fear and the resulting disaster itself.
And unfortunately, it also summarizes some of the problems of today, too. Justification for arms and creating the market for arms expenditure is not a new concept.
The call to war and fear-mongering is an old tradition. This rush to globalize arms production and sales ignores the grave humanitarian and strategic consequences of global weapons proliferation. Already, profit motives in the military industry have resulted in arms export decisions that contravene such U.
Industrialized countries negotiate free trade and investment agreements with other countries, but exempt military spending from the liberalizing demands of the agreement.
Since only the wealthy countries can afford to devote billions on military spending, they will always be able to give their corporations hidden subsidies through defence contracts, and maintain a technologically advanced industrial capacity. And so, in every international trade and investment agreement one will find a clause which exempts government programs and policies deemed vital for national security.
Here is the loophole that allows the maintenance of corporate subsidies through virtually unlimited military spending.The proliferation of small arms and light weapons (SALW) in various parts of the globe continues to pose a systemic and pervasive threat to the long-term social and economic development of many nations, particularly in small developing states.
No nation, region, or sub-region is immune from the. International commerce is critical to America’s economy, and the entire world. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is committed to keeping it safe and vibrant. CBP creates and implements programs using sophisticated technologies, and trains personnel to help achieve the goals of securing U.S.
ports and borders while also expediting trade. The Arms Trade and International System.
Cambridge, UK: Ballinger, Differs from other work by accounting for the role of the government in pursuing arms exports. Stohl, Rachel, and Suzette Grillot. The International Arms Trade. Cambridge, UK: Polity, ARMS TRADE TREATY ASSISTANCE: IDENTIFYING A ROLE FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION mark bromley and paul holtom resources to create and maintain a complex arms transfer control system.
At the same time, they are likely to be involved in the international arms trade as either import, transit or trans-shipment states, or. The Arms Trade and International System. Cambridge, UK: Ballinger, Differs from other work by accounting for the role of the government in pursuing arms exports.
Stohl, Rachel, and Suzette Grillot. The International Arms . In Brief. The goal of this article is to examine and suggest proposals that could enhance the role of the international Arms Trade Treaty—presently in discussion at the United Nations—in the regulation of the international arms trade and in addressing the role of the legal trade in: a) providing the bulk of the arms used in armed conflicts, armed violence and human rights abuses; b) the.